#AnnoConvo If the authors consider Twitter as referring to “everything in the world” and if we consider, like Heidegger, the world as “the domain of all domains”, then Twitter is text, and all inside Twitter is annotation.
— Paulo Pinto (@w3bk3rn3l) May 8, 2021
Notes
Kind:#AnnoConvo pic.twitter.com/iBxkcHDAv5
— Paulo Pinto (@w3bk3rn3l) May 2, 2021
#AnnoConvo How can you get to know me through my notes? Do the speak for me? How do you know who authored them? pic.twitter.com/t4epYKQvUw
— Paulo Pinto (@w3bk3rn3l) April 22, 2021
Derrida (1991) quoted on the intertextuality of #annotation.
Two comments written during 2019 @pubpub open review of #Annotation printed in our book.
Handwritten question by Paulo, photographed & shared on Twitter, a platform of notes on notes.
Love the layers. Join #AnnoConvo https://t.co/M74WmMDNGV
— Remi Kalir (@remikalir) April 19, 2021
While talking meetings have much merit — when planned well they can be efficient and offer a level of comfort in speaking in person — they can also be subject to a host of problems: one person dominating, others checking out and multitasking, side conversations, straying off course, and pressures to conform to the boss’s ideas.
one person dominating –› this is probably one of the reasons why meetings are so counterproductive
from Hypothesis Stream https://ift.tt/3teW4xW
via IFTTT